[Interest] SIMD accelerated wrappers for relevant Qt container classes (QVector, ...) or QByteArray?

René J.V. Bertin rjvbertin at gmail.com
Wed May 10 13:21:53 CEST 2017


On Wednesday May 10 2017 14:07:56 Konstantin Tokarev wrote:

> It's still much easier to deal with intrinsics than inline asm

I'm not doubting that, and I can see how it is useful to have newer intrinsics that contain a fallback so they can be used safely and without penalty on older CPUs.

At some point you could start to wonder though why those functions have such "memorable" names ;)

R.



More information about the Interest mailing list