[Interest] Qt at the C++20 era

Corentin corentin.jabot at gmail.com
Tue May 2 16:56:58 CEST 2017

It was my understanding that Herb has a somewhat working clang-based
prototype  ? Do you think that will be made available at some point ?
It would be fun to try to properly implement Qt meta object system  (maybe
using Olivier's Verdigris as a starting point) and provide feedback based
on that.

One other feature I'd like to see is to have access to [[attributes]] from
within the static reflection api ( for which there are currently multiple
competing proposals if I understand correctly ?)


Le mar. 2 mai 2017 à 15:21, Giuseppe D'Angelo <giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com> a
écrit :

> On 01/05/17 21:59, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > If not, this is vapourware.
> To clarify (I was there during Herb's talk at ACCUCONF2017):
> Herb said clearly that all of that is currently not official, not even
> proposed, so the final thing (if there will be one) could also be
> completely different.
> The talk was the first time this stuff got showcased publicly. It was
> just neat that he used Qt (and moc) as an example of what the new syntax
> would unlock.
> P0633R0 does *not* deal with Herb's proposal because there isn't one
> (it's indeed quoted as "private communication").
> My 2 c,
> --
> Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
> KDAB (UK) Ltd., a KDAB Group company | Tel: UK +44-1625-809908
> <+44%201625%20809908>
> KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20170502/d35196b0/attachment.html>

More information about the Interest mailing list