[Interest] minimum macOS runtime version for Qt 5.9+
Pavel Mogilevskiy
pmogilevskiy at gmail.com
Wed Nov 29 14:32:53 CET 2017
+1
Same here. We have users which don't have a chance for some reasons to
upgrade to the latest OS X version, therefore we are using Qt 5.8
(instead of Qt 5.9 LTS which we are using across other OSs) to support
at least OSX 10.9.
So I vote for support older OS X versions as long as possible.
On 11/29/2017 3:08 PM, coroberti . wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Hamish Moffatt
> <hamish at risingsoftware.com> wrote:
>> On 29/11/17 14:46, Jake Petroules wrote:
>>> Why do you need to support older versions?
>> Because my customers are using them, right back to 10.7. They are
>> educational institutions with whole labs of machines set up the same way -
>> they probably get one chance a year to upgrade, and for whatever reason they
>> haven't so far. I can't stick to old Qt versions either because of various
>> bugs. 5.6 LTS has issues with accessibility crashes on newer macOS. 5.8 is
>> crashing in file open dialogs on 10.13. Thus I'm stuck.
> Exactly, my case with edu users.
> They are using Mac HW for up to 10 years.
> About 1/3 is not upgradeable anymore: 10.7 and 10.8
>
>> I wish there was a bit more of a time window before you deprecate old
>> versions. 10.7 is no older than Windows 7.
> +1
>
> Kind regards,
> Robert
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
More information about the Interest
mailing list