[Interest] QML vs Electron
Sylvain Pointeau
sylvain.pointeau at gmail.com
Tue Aug 7 17:56:39 CEST 2018
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 at 17:25, ekke <ekke at ekkes-corner.org> wrote:
> Am 07.08.18 um 15:52 schrieb Mike Krus via Interest:
>
> It was already addressed in my post. It seems to satisfy LGPL requirements on your part, but not on Apple's part (because they don't allow the re-linked application to run due to their DRM.)
>
> given all the appropriate project setup and compiled object code (.o, .a, even shared lib files), a user signed up to the free Apple Developer should in theory be able to link another version of Qt into a final executable, codesign it and run it on his device. Would be a real pain to setup and maintain though.
>
>
> yes - this should be possible - found a good description:
> https://stackoverflow.com/a/39438539
>
> but not every customer likes to publish the APK or iOS object files
> outside the stores ;-)
>
> it's reallly not easy to motivate other mobile app devs to switch over to
> Qt with high license fees or complicated rules to satisfy LGPL
>
> having a 25 EUR Independent app developer license would be better ;-)
>
100% agree, for startup and independant developer. We don’t even think at
this price and it contributes to the development of Qt.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20180807/63c31d23/attachment.html>
More information about the Interest
mailing list