[Interest] Standardizing Qt Kit Names

[André Pönitz]

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:27:57PM +0200, Jason H wrote:
> It might be a minor point, but I think it would be good to have more uniform kit name structure.

This has irked me for a while, too.

> 
> I'd like it to be Qt / Version / Platform like Qt 5.10.1 for Desktop Qt 5.10.1 for iOS Qt 5.10.1 for iOS
> Simulator
> 
> Instead I currently see: Android  for armabi-v7a (GC... Qt5.10.1..) Desktop Qt 5.10.1 clang ...  Qt 5.10.1
> for iOS
> 
> Either iOS has to come first, or Android, Desktop, have to come last. I think for readability (and
> sorting) it should be <Qt version> / <Platform> / <Sub platform>
> 
> Where subplatform is Simulator, or CPU architecture This way, all Qt platforms of the same version would
> be grouped together. Since I regard (and I think others) Qt version as the first logical grouping rather
> than platform (who wants to select Platform, then Qt Version?, maybe if enough people want it, make it
> dynamic?)

Adding uo/down buttons to change the order should be possible.

Fancy creating a bug report?

I am sure the default assignee for the component will be happy
to re-assign the issue to me ;-}

Andre'