[Interest] QWebView vs. QWebEngine

[Walter Stefan]

Thanks, because the web-page of Qt is confusing.

At this page there is written next to Qt Web Engine (under LGPL only). Therefore I concluded that the rest is GPL.

-----Original Message-----
From: Konstantin Tokarev [mailto:annulen at yandex.ru] 
Sent: Montag, 29. Jänner 2018 18:20
To: Walter Stefan <Stefan.Walter at lisec.com>; interest at qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] QWebView vs. QWebEngine



29.01.2018, 17:08, "Walter Stefan" <stefan.walter at lisec.com>:
> Thanks for the quick response.
>
> Is there a web-link that supports this, or where can I seen the licenses to the Qt modules?

https://webkit.org/licensing-webkit/
http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebkit.git/tree/LICENSE.LGPLv21

>
> Best Regards,
> Stefan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Konstantin Tokarev [mailto:annulen at yandex.ru]
> Sent: Montag, 29. Jänner 2018 18:05
> To: Walter Stefan <Stefan.Walter at lisec.com>; interest at qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Interest] QWebView vs. QWebEngine
>
> 29.01.2018, 16:58, "Walter Stefan" <stefan.walter at lisec.com>:
>>  Hi,
>>
>>  I’ve done some research about QWebView and QWebEngine and came to the following conclusion:
>>
>>  QWebView is under GPL and uses internally WebKit.
>
> Incorrect. QtWebKit code is LGPL+BSD.
>
>>  QWebEngine is under LGPL and uses internally Chromium.
>>
>>  Please let me know if this is correct, because I don’t want to disclose my source and that would mean I have to use QWebEngine.
>>
>>  Is there beside the license other limitations to be aware of?
>>
>>  Thanks and Regards,
>>
>>  Stefan
>>  ,
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  Interest mailing list
>>  Interest at qt-project.org
>>  http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>
> --
> Regards,
> Konstantin

-- 
Regards,
Konstantin