[Interest] QWebView vs. QWebEngine
Stefan.Walter at lisec.com
Mon Jan 29 15:27:17 CET 2018
Thanks, because the web-page of Qt is confusing.
At this page there is written next to Qt Web Engine (under LGPL only). Therefore I concluded that the rest is GPL.
From: Konstantin Tokarev [mailto:annulen at yandex.ru]
Sent: Montag, 29. Jänner 2018 18:20
To: Walter Stefan <Stefan.Walter at lisec.com>; interest at qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] QWebView vs. QWebEngine
29.01.2018, 17:08, "Walter Stefan" <stefan.walter at lisec.com>:
> Thanks for the quick response.
> Is there a web-link that supports this, or where can I seen the licenses to the Qt modules?
> Best Regards,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Konstantin Tokarev [mailto:annulen at yandex.ru]
> Sent: Montag, 29. Jänner 2018 18:05
> To: Walter Stefan <Stefan.Walter at lisec.com>; interest at qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Interest] QWebView vs. QWebEngine
> 29.01.2018, 16:58, "Walter Stefan" <stefan.walter at lisec.com>:
>> I’ve done some research about QWebView and QWebEngine and came to the following conclusion:
>> QWebView is under GPL and uses internally WebKit.
> Incorrect. QtWebKit code is LGPL+BSD.
>> QWebEngine is under LGPL and uses internally Chromium.
>> Please let me know if this is correct, because I don’t want to disclose my source and that would mean I have to use QWebEngine.
>> Is there beside the license other limitations to be aware of?
>> Thanks and Regards,
>> Interest mailing list
>> Interest at qt-project.org
More information about the Interest