[Interest] Interest Digest, Vol 79, Issue 21

[Roland Hughes]

On 04/30/2018 10:57 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> At this point, I'm thinking long-term we should think of whether we should
> deprecate QDataStream or whether the discussion we had on basing it on CBOR
> makes more sense.
Whatever replaces/continues QDataStream must continue big-endian.

If you want to create a class for little computers which never transmit 
data to real computers, that's fine. Just don't destroy something for 
the simple reason it isn't the default behavior of hobby computers. It 
was created the way it is for a reason and that reason still exists today.

-- 
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630)-205-1593

http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net
http://www.johnsmith-book.com
http://www.logikalblog.com
http://www.interestingauthors.com/blog
http://lesedi.us/
http://onedollarcontentstore.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20180430/78b215f5/attachment.html>