[Interest] Porting Qt to our RTOS

[Giuseppe D'Angelo]

On 29/09/18 23:45, Roland Hughes wrote:
>> Roland, consider yourself on notice. Your comment about OpenZinc was fine --
>> even if it is a competitor, telling people about their options is the right
>> thing to do. You can relate your experience with Qt and where things did not
>> satisfy you. But you cannot make false assertions and stupid generalisations.
> I should have said Jenkins like process. You prefer Coin.
> 
> https://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/08/08/coin-continuous-integration-for-qt/
> 

You stated:

> a lot of shortcuts 
> get taken and are allowed as long as the test-nothing automated test 
> clears Jenkins.

This is a FALSE STATEMENT, no matter if it's Jenkins or Coin or whatever 
CI suite Qt happens to be using. You're not off the hook.

-- 
Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4007 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20180930/e85bee5c/attachment.bin>