[Interest] Qt free software policy

Roland Hughes roland at logikalsolutions.com
Wed Aug 14 21:09:02 CEST 2019

If you do not need the latest bells and whistles, drop back to Qt 4.8


That version is rather prominent in the medical device world, because of 
the issues you bring up here.

On 8/14/19 1:36 PM, David M. Cotter wrote:
> +1 on this
> i am in the process of porting my legacy project to Qt and am afraid that i’ve made the wrong choice.  i’m just one guy and i bet my whole business on the availability of what  i need from Qt under LGPL
> i’m already using a third party HTTP server so i’m not affected by this but it’s a worrying sign. I too agree that the HTTP server really should be LGPL.
> What’s going to happen? It’s taken me over a year’s worth of work to get this far with Qt and i’m only half done. did i make the wrong choice?
> -dave

Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630)-205-1593  (cell)

More information about the Interest mailing list