[Interest] Replacement for Qt4 QMatrix4x4?
thiago.macieira at intel.com
Fri Feb 22 07:30:08 CET 2019
On Thursday, 21 February 2019 13:47:05 PST Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> (Uh...why? I am not particularly amused by the loss of precision, nor
> the extremely subtle incompatibility.)
Changed in commit 51d40d7e9bdfc63c5109aef5b732aa2ba10f985a:
One of the two reasons the commit message says was to avoid the surprise in
that it used float in embedded platforms (read: ARM). That rationale is no
longer applicable, as we changed qreal to be double in all platforms about one
year later: http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/commit/?
I think we need to reconsider the storage type for Qt 6. Added to
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel System Software Products
More information about the Interest