[Interest] Replacement for Qt4 QMatrix4x4?

Giuseppe D'Angelo giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com
Fri Feb 22 19:39:38 CET 2019

Il 22/02/19 19:27, Matthew Woehlke ha scritto:
> We*almost*  had that with QVectorNd and QMatrixNxN... until Qt5 went and
> made them float. Sigh.

*Deliberately*, to target GPU programming, where the only things that 
matter (de facto) are floats.

> What I would*really*  love is to see Eigen or the like standardized as
> part of C++23 :-D. But that's getting OT...

Almost, we're getting more and more technical debt in Qt, and repeating 
the mistakes of the past (NIH and so on). Should Qt 6 try and change 
this trend?

My 2 c,
Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4007 bytes
Desc: Firma crittografica S/MIME
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20190222/e2c15204/attachment.bin>

More information about the Interest mailing list