[Interest] parallel asynchrone action

Sylvain Pointeau sylvain.pointeau at gmail.com
Mon Mar 4 16:33:49 CET 2019

On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 10:56 PM Elvis Stansvik <elvstone at gmail.com> wrote:

> There should be no such delay in QFutureWatcher. I've never seen that,
> and I've used QtConcurrent::run/mapped + QFutureWatcher quite a lot.
> I would investigate that before making my own mechanism.

I am on macos, on which OS are you doing it?
I had the same issue for FileSystemWatcher, where on windows it was
immediate and it was implemented on macos via polling.
I was thinking that it may be the same issue for QFutureWatcher.

However, if we exclude QFutureWatcher, is this approach good? could it be

Also how would it be so different with a QFutureWatcher, it removes one
class TaskNotifier, but the rest stays the same, do you see another way to
make a action asynchrone?

Best regards,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20190304/39e72476/attachment.html>

More information about the Interest mailing list