[Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt, Commercial developers

[Christian Gagneraud]

On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 19:09, Roland Hughes <roland at logikalsolutions.com> wrote:
> No, that was never the point of this thread.

Me too:

My first 'commercial' Android app, made with 'pure' commercial Qt SDK,
produced its first crash report:
----
04-03 11:30:53.384 17079 17115 E AndroidRuntime: Process:
org.qtproject.example.TestApp, PID: XXXX
04-03 11:30:53.384 17079 17115 E AndroidRuntime:
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: dlopen failed:
/lib/arm/libc++_static.so" has bad ELF magic
----

The point is not about the crash itself, that was my mistake.

The point is:
I used a 'commercial only' Qt license to produce an Android app, and
the first thing this app says starts with 'org.qtproject', not
'com.foobarbaz'.

I hope you'll find this detail funny!

Chris, NZ, day#8

PS: Please don't ignore people with dual licensed Qt installs