[Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt Commercial developers
tuukka.turunen at qt.io
Tue Mar 31 14:02:02 CEST 2020
As I wrote a bit earlier, for completely independent projects/products it is fine that one is using commercial and one open-source. This is much more likely to happen in a big corporation than a small company, but possible scenario in both.
Note that these really should not be same or in practice the same - or in any way depending, relating, using etc each other as defined in the license agreement.
See licensing FAQ question 2.7 at https://www.qt.io/faq/ and License agreement at https://www.qt.io/terms-conditions/
On 31.3.2020, 14.33, "Interest on behalf of Thiago Macieira" <interest-bounces at qt-project.org on behalf of thiago.macieira at intel.com> wrote:
On Monday, 30 March 2020 16:59:11 -03 Elvis Stansvik wrote:
> > Please read the commercial license agreement and the licensing FAQ. The
> > restriction has nothing to do with open-source licensing. It is about a
> > company, who is using a commercially licensed Qt not to use parts of the
> > same licensed Qt product under open-source license. If there was no such
> > restriction, a company could have a team of 10 developers, but only 1 or
> > 2 commercial license for Qt.
> Up until now, you've said "same project". Now you are switching to
> "company". Please clarify.
And don't think of a 10-developer company. Think of a company with 20000
developers, with offices all over the world. If *any* of them buy a commercial
licence, does it mean everyone else must stop using the open source Qt? And Qt
How about contributing to Qt open source? Do they have to stop too?
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel System Software Products
Interest mailing list
Interest at qt-project.org
More information about the Interest