[Interest] Guide me through the Qt offerings for GUIs
private at bernhard-lindner.de
Thu Apr 22 13:01:25 CEST 2021
> Widgets are heavy, often very complex objects. They often come with all bells and
> whistles. QPushButton always has the data structure to support QPushButton::setMenu,
> even if probably <1% of buttons out there ever use that feature. That’s ok on desktop
> machines, it’s not ok on embedded systems.
Hm, this kind of confirms my impression: Quick is lightweight, simplified and suited for
embedded and touch. While widgets are more powerful and suited for complex desktops
applications. This makes me wonder even more why Qt gave up widgets. The logical
explanation is, Qt kind of gave up desktop.
You explained why the widgets concept is not compatible with the Quick concept. Can you
also explain why it was not possible to implement Quick as an additional, mostly widget-
independent C++ layer and then wrap it declaratively?
More information about the Interest