[Interest] Mixing Commercial and Open Source license for, different, projects

Christian Gagneraud chgans at gmail.com
Thu Mar 18 12:55:17 CET 2021


On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 00:41, Christian Gagneraud <chgans at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 03:32, Roland Hughes <roland at logikalsolutions.com> wrote:
> > > On 3/17/21 6:00 AM, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
> > >> Out of curiosity: what alternatives are people settling on?
> > >
> > Forgot to mention. Comcast dumped Qt in favor of Webkit some time late
> > last year. You probably were on the SPAM and phone call list. We all
> > know just how technical the people pimps put on the phone are, but here
> > is what they told me.
> >
> > FUD + death-of-perpetual-license = abandon-Qt
>
> FUD from Qt + FUD from Roland = people getting tired
>
> I'm tired, and looking every single day how to get rid of Qt.
> I'm not happy about the situation, but it forces me to rethink.
>
> My main grief is that Qt doesn't seem to care about C++.
> What was their last contribution to the standard?
>
> One day, C++ will have introspection, and  it will come from boost, not Qt...
> So sad!

Tip to whoever:
Qt = Atlassian.
Expensive stuff for big companies that think you can buy success.

Chris


More information about the Interest mailing list