[Interest] The willy-nilly deletion of convenience, methods (was: Mixing Commercial and Open...)
ekke
ekke at ekkes-corner.org
Mon Mar 22 16:48:20 CET 2021
+1
Qt for me still is the best cross-platform solution for mobile app
development enabling me to build great (and performant) apps from one
source.
from time to time looking at Flutter but still feel better using QML for
UI and C++ for the rest.
cannot say much about Qt6 yet because I'm waiting for 6.2 to get all the
modules I need - will start refactoring all the depricated parts next
weeks/months step by step beside my daily work
Am 22.03.21 um 16:22 schrieb Nelson, Michael:
> +1 for idea that mobile support has not been the priority in QtCo's mind that I need it to be.
> +1 for idea that filing bug reports and voting for them did not result in my concerns being addressed. UX with QML across mobile and desktop platforms could be better but many issues simply sit unaddressed.
>
> Still, cross-platform support is nevertheless strong and QML is indeed a great language for UI, so I'm still a paying customer, for now. Keeping an eye on Flutter, though. 😊
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> MICHAEL NELSON | Sr. Software Engineer
> T 703-406-2800, 341
> michael.nelson at otthydromet.com | www.otthydromet.com
>
>
--
ekke (ekkehard gentz)
independent software architect
international development native mobile business apps
Qt Mobile: Android, iOS, W10 (former projects: BlackBerry 10)
*Qt Champion
BlackBerry Elite Developer
*
max-josefs-platz 30, D-83022 rosenheim, germany
twitter: @ekkescorner
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/ekkehard/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20210322/90d072c0/attachment.html>
More information about the Interest
mailing list