[Interest] Individual developer license is too expensive
scott at towel42.com
Tue Feb 22 22:49:49 CET 2022
Why do you have to statically link?
Why not use the lgpl license and the dynamically bound libs?
From: Interest <interest-bounces at qt-project.org> On Behalf Of Ben Cottrell
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 1:45 PM
To: interest at qt-project.org
Subject: [Interest] Individual developer license is too expensive
I would like to use Qt libraries that are statically linked into my binaries, but the monthly license cost is too expensive, as I'm unemployed at the moment.
Is the license price negotiable for individual developers?
Interest mailing list
Interest at qt-project.org
More information about the Interest