[Interest] Individual developer license is too expensive

[Ben Cottrell]

On 23/02/22 8:22 pm, Maurice Kalinowski wrote:
> Hey,
>
> just checking whether you are aware of the Qt for Small Business license, where you seem to be eligible for?
> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.qt.io%2Fpricing%2Fqt-for-small-business&data=04%7C01%7C%7C12554cb0645c479f73de08d9f69d5116%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637811977803264422%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=qmHanZ6K0cOWRrF0OMYsVqQv7R9C07mQjUvkxPziKT0%3D&reserved=0
>
> BR,
> Maurice
>
I still can't afford the yearly cost of 739 NZD, but maybe this will 
change in the future
when I'm more successful.

Thanks,
Ben

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Interest <interest-bounces at qt-project.org> On Behalf Of Ben Cottrell
>> Sent: Tuesday, 22 February 2022 22:45
>> To: interest at qt-project.org
>> Subject: [Interest] Individual developer license is too expensive
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to use Qt libraries that are statically linked into my binaries, but
>> the monthly license cost is too expensive, as I'm unemployed at the
>> moment.
>>
>> Is the license price negotiable for individual developers?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ben Cottrell
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Interest mailing list
>> Interest at qt-project.org
>> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.qt-project.org%2Flistinfo%2Finterest&data=04%7C01%7C%7C12554cb0645c479f73de08d9f69d5116%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637811977803264422%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=%2B9aDjMkb%2FsLvFpNxU3AD%2FcwhZMfaXMb97xIvLzxm9ac%3D&reserved=0