[Interest] Future of constexpr in Qt?

[Thiago Macieira]

On Tuesday 26 November 2024 00:25:45 Pacific Standard Time Schimkowitsch Robert 
wrote:
> The problem with testing UB cases is that the program can do anything, which
> means a runtime unit test could succeed even though e.g. I hit a signed
> integer overflow. That's why I would consider compile-time tests for such
> cases.

Oh, I forgot to add the part that you also need a CI that compiles and runs 
with ASan and UBSan.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Principal Engineer - Intel DCAI Platform & System Engineering
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5152 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20241126/8df10885/attachment.bin>