[Marketing] I'd like to blog at the labs.qt. blog or the equivalent if exists in qt-project.org

[daniel.molkentin at nokia.com]

The non-identical content is one of the problems I was mentioning. It will be exactly the same soon. http://qt-project.org has always just been feeding of planetqt.org. It will soon feed of http://planet.qt-project.org's<http://planet.qt-project.org's> RSS feed instead.

Daniel

From: ext Volker Götz [mailto:berlinbikerx at googlemail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 6:11 PM
To: Molkentin Daniel (Nokia-MP/Berlin)
Cc: marketing at qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Marketing] I'd like to blog at the labs.qt. blog or the equivalent if exists in qt-project.org

Hi,

Am 25.06.2012 um 18:01 schrieb Daniel Molkentin:


There is planet.qt-project.org<http://planet.qt-project.org/>, which planetqt.org<http://planetqt.org/> is going to redirect.
Apart from a fresh look, the immediate benefit is that its sources are
on codereview, so you can add your own blog if you get a reviewer to
acknowledge the relevance of your blog to the Qt community. That's how
the approver model magically works. Yay! planetqt.org<http://planetqt.org/> is about to be
transferred to the foundation and will be redirecting to
planet.qt-project.org<http://planet.qt-project.org/> once I ironed out some weird behavior exhibited by
rawdog.



The wording is a bit unfortunate as we have two plantes right now: http://planet.qt-project.org/ and the aggregation on the home page of DevNet at http://qt-project.org/

Both show different contents. We should either rename one of them or make them being fed from identical sources.

Cheers
Volker

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/marketing/attachments/20120625/9f09c05b/attachment.html>