[PySide] About the next PySide release

[anatoly techtonik]

I can't confirm that - there are no changes in the Gitorious repository.
http://qt.gitorious.org/pyside/pyside/commits/master
--
anatoly t.


On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 2:43 AM, paulo alcantara
<paulo.alcantara at openbossa.org> wrote:
> Maybe its better or not. It doesnt matter either.
> The execellent work that Hugo has been doing (even with no much spare
> time to do it) is already done.
>
> On 3/10/12, anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Hugo Parente Lima
>> <hugo.lima at openbossa.org> wrote:
>>> On Friday 09 March 2012 10:14:25 Matti Airas wrote:
>>>> On 09.03.2012 15:12, ext Anderson Lizardo wrote:
>>>> > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Matti Airas<matti.p.airas at nokia.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> >> BTW, how did you actually do the removal? Did you just branch the
>>>> >> repos
>>>> >> before the offending commits and then merge all commits except the
>>>> >> offending ones?
>>>> >
>>>> > I wonder if a  " git rebase -i commit_id^ " (where "commit_id" is the
>>>> > commit to be removed) and removing the line on the interactive rebase
>>>> > editor, would fix this more or less easily :)
>>>>
>>>> That was the approach I tried, but that breaks down in merges. Couldn't
>>>> quite figure out what the exact problem was, though.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> ma.
>>>
>>> Work done...
>>
>> Just when I thought I found something.. =)
>> http://linux.die.net/man/1/git-filter-branch
>>
>> Take a look at `git filter-branch --commit-filter`. Is it better than
>> rebase?
>>
>> --
>> anatoly t.
>> _______________________________________________
>> PySide mailing list
>> PySide at qt-project.org
>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside
>>