[PySide] RFC: Removing PySide rom git-hub?

anatoly techtonik techtonik at gmail.com
Sat Mar 17 16:25:18 CET 2012


On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Hugo Parente Lima
<hugo.lima at openbossa.org> wrote:
> On Friday 16 March 2012 12:00:44 anatoly techtonik wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Hugo Parente Lima
>>
>> <hugo.lima at openbossa.org> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > gerrit only sync PySide repositories with gitorious, so the git-hub
>> > repositories will be out dated because nobody will remember to sync them
>> > :-/
>> >
>> > So, my question is: Should I remove PySide from git-hub? No code will be
>> > lost because the helper repositories found on github and not on gerrit
>> > can be found on gitorious.
>>
>> Nooo. Many people can't access Gerrit and can't submit patches therefore.
>> Gitorious suxx as was discussed many times. I'd like BuildScripts to
>> continue using GitHub. Because barrier for patch entry to Gerrit is too
>> high.
>>
>> Why isn't it possible to sync with GitHub?
>> http://gerrit.googlecode.com/svn/documentation/2.1.5/config-replication.htm
>> l
>
> I agree, but this configuration isn't up to me, I need to ask to people on qt-
> project if they can do this for us. I'm going to ping them after the weekend.

I was about to sent a request to geg at qt-project.org but then noticed
that PySide and Gitorious repos are in sync:

http://qt.gitorious.org/pyside/pyside/commits/master
https://github.com/PySide/PySide/commits/master

Is GitHub sync still an issue? It may worth to add a note though that
the proper place to sent patches is Gerrit.


BTW, what was the decision about http://www.pyside.org/ ? It can be
hosted on GitHub.
--
anatoly t.



More information about the PySide mailing list