From christian.kandeler at qt.io Thu Nov 24 11:19:39 2022 From: christian.kandeler at qt.io (Christian Kandeler) Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 11:19:39 +0100 Subject: [Qbs] Qbs 1.24 released Message-ID: Hi, we have released qbs 1.24.0 today. As usual, sources, binaries, change log etc can be found here: https://download.qt.io/official_releases/qbs/1.24.0/ This release of qbs is also part of Qt Creator 9.0.0. Christian From hkarel at yandex.ru Thu Nov 24 18:37:55 2022 From: hkarel at yandex.ru (=?UTF-8?B?0JrQsNGA0LXQu9C40L0g0J/QsNCy0LXQuw==?=) Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 20:37:55 +0300 Subject: [Qbs] RUNPATH problem in Ubuntu 20.04 In-Reply-To: References: <8266b624-68cb-4756-29f5-138dc330d8d0@qt.io> <69312d77-9d3a-92b9-c008-9bfe6a6a2daf@qt.io> <085f643b-a7a5-4aba-50d4-e888af9b27c0@yandex.ru> <9ee300bc-0ceb-77c8-f81c-839ef07c319c@qt.io> <73b70ac4-8b14-06e9-fa37-086883172ae6@yandex.ru> <1d5b65e1-6916-ad8c-3b7d-2e87a5f36e1b@qt.io> Message-ID: <5835e5b5-e68a-b97e-0410-81e81604fb69@yandex.ru> Christian, hello. Are there any plans to solve the problem of RUNPATH? Or will everything remain as it is? -- Pavel 26.10.2022 16:29, ??????? ????? ?????: > > Do I understand correctly that you use self-built QtC and you built > it using Qbs? > Yes. Moreover, Qbs is also self-built :)) > > > My understanding is that RUNPATH only affects libraries with a > NEEDED entry, i.e. direct dependencies, while RPATH covers indirect > dependencies as well. > Here says about the same: > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47117443/dynamic-linking-with-rpath-not-working-under-ubuntu-17-10/47243544#47243544 > > > What I don't understand is why Pavel's linker uses RUNPATH and mine > uses RPATH by default. Could it be that distributions patch binutils > according to their preferences? > This problem began to arise in people when switching to Ubuntu 18.04 > (I ran into it at Ubuntu 20.04 because I missed 18.04) > Apparently in Canonical decided that RUNPATH by default is more right. > > -- > Pavel > > > 26.10.2022 14:38, Christian Kandeler via Qbs ?????: >> On 10/26/22 13:24, ???? ?????????? wrote: >>> I think, both RPATH and RUNPATH should work. >> >> My understanding is that RUNPATH only affects libraries with a NEEDED >> entry, i.e. direct dependencies, while RPATH covers indirect >> dependencies as well. What I don't understand is why Pavel's linker >> uses RUNPATH and mine uses RPATH by default. Could it be that >> distributions patch binutils according to their preferences? >> >> >> Christian >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Qbs mailing list >> Qbs at qt-project.org >> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/qbs > > > _______________________________________________ > Qbs mailing list > Qbs at qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/qbs -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: