[Qbs] Qbs 1.23.2 released

[Карелин Павел]

 > Do I understand correctly that you use self-built QtC and you built 
it using Qbs?
Yes. Moreover, Qbs is also self-built :))

 > My understanding is that RUNPATH only affects libraries with a NEEDED 
entry, i.e. direct dependencies, while RPATH covers indirect 
dependencies as well.
Here says about the same: 
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47117443/dynamic-linking-with-rpath-not-working-under-ubuntu-17-10/47243544#47243544

 > What I don't understand is why Pavel's linker uses RUNPATH and mine 
uses RPATH by default. Could it be that distributions patch binutils 
according to their preferences?
This problem began to arise in people when switching to Ubuntu 18.04 (I 
ran into it at Ubuntu 20.04 because I missed 18.04)
Apparently in Canonical decided that RUNPATH by default is more right.

--
Pavel


26.10.2022 14:38, Christian Kandeler via Qbs пишет:
> On 10/26/22 13:24, Иван Комиссаров wrote:
>> I think, both RPATH and RUNPATH should work.
>
> My understanding is that RUNPATH only affects libraries with a NEEDED 
> entry, i.e. direct dependencies, while RPATH covers indirect 
> dependencies as well. What I don't understand is why Pavel's linker 
> uses RUNPATH and mine uses RPATH by default. Could it be that 
> distributions patch binutils according to their preferences?
>
>
> Christian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qbs mailing list
> Qbs at qt-project.org
> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/qbs

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qbs/attachments/20221026/bc194538/attachment.htm>