[Qt-creator] parser ?error? + SymbolVisitor
Roberto Raggi
roberto.raggi at trolltech.com
Tue Mar 17 11:42:17 CET 2009
Hi,
On 16.03.2009, at 19:43, Marek Jasovsky wrote:
> Hi
>
> for this short one line code snippet, I get same AST as if I had no
> parameters of the function.
> void foo(int a, int b) { return 0; }
you are right, as default our default visitor does not visit the
parameters. I fixed it, in our local repository, you will get the
patch with the next update or you can apply the following patch to
your local repo.
diff --git a/src/shared/cplusplus/AST.cpp b/src/shared/cplusplus/AST.cpp
index 19373cd..1f05114 100644
--- a/src/shared/cplusplus/AST.cpp
+++ b/src/shared/cplusplus/AST.cpp
@@ -1682,6 +1682,10 @@ FunctionDeclaratorAST
*FunctionDeclaratorAST::clone(MemoryPool *pool) co
void FunctionDeclaratorAST::accept0(ASTVisitor *visitor)
{
if (visitor->visit(this)) {
+ accept(parameters, visitor);
+ for (SpecifierAST *it = cv_qualifier_seq; it; it = it->next)
+ accept(it, visitor);
+ accept(exception_specification, visitor);
}
visitor->endVisit(this);
}
>
> btw. if I have Block as result from SymbolVisitor pass... how can I
> analyze code which is found deeper than the Block?
what do you mean with analyze code?
ciao robe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-creator-old/attachments/20090317/da24991d/attachment.html
More information about the Qt-creator-old
mailing list