[Qt-creator] Project Tree

Porfirio porfirio.ribeiro at sapo.pt
Tue Mar 24 15:22:51 CET 2009


Yes, if Qt Creator gives an option to follow the folder structure would 
be good enought ;)


Em 24-03-2009 13:55, eike.ziller at nokia.com escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> what is the reason for "virtual" folders? Why is important to you to have virtual folders in contrast to just putting the aboutdialog.* files in a real subdirectory "about"?
>
> SOURCES += main.cpp \
>     mainwindow.cpp\
>     about/aboutdialog.cpp
>
> etc?
> I know that QtCreator doesn't map the filesystem folders in folders in the tree atm, but what if it would?
>
> All in all, the project tree is not a very efficient way of navigating anyway - though sometimes helpful if you just can't remember at all how some file was named. So that's why it is there at all ;-). But as long as you have a rough idea about a file name, method name, or class name, using "Locator" (or "Follow Symbol") is usually better suited IMO.
>
> Best regards, Eike
>
> ________________________________________
> From: qt-creator-bounces at trolltech.com [qt-creator-bounces at trolltech.com] On Behalf Of ext Porfirio [porfirio.ribeiro at sapo.pt]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 12:03
> To: qt-creator at trolltech.com
> Subject: Re: [Qt-creator] Project Tree
>
> Well QtCreator creates a file calledyourproject.pro.user to save project settings, so i guess it could be stored there
> Or maybe use comments on pro file like
>
> SOURCES += main.cpp \
>
>                          mainwindow.cpp \
>
>                          aboutdialog.cpp             #/about
>
>
> HEADERS += mainwindow.h \
>
>                          aboutdialog.h                 #/about
>
>
> FORMS     += mainwindow.ui \
>
>                          aboutdialog.ui                #/about
>
> Would be ignored by qmake and the ide could understand it
>
>
> Em 24-03-2009 10:07, Sam Clegg escreveu:
>
> On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 09:58 +0100, Albert Graells Rovira wrote:
>
>
> Another vote for this proposal :)
>
>
>
> And anther vote for this.
>
> Really we'd like to see a fully flexible hierarchy in the file view
> where groups can be configured independently of the filesystem layout if
> necessary (which is possible in, dare I say it, msvc).  I know its
> tricky since qmake doesn't natively support logical groupings of files
> but presumably this grouping information doesn't have to live in the
> qmake file.
>
>
>
>
>
> 2009/3/20 Kuiper, Luuk<kuiper at hitt.nl><mailto:kuiper at hitt.nl>
>
>          We deal we great projects as well. And they subdivide in in
>          subdirectories, but it has to lead to one library.
>          So we do not use sub-project for that.
>          And, yes, I also like very much to see a tree structure in the
>          file
>          overview that is organized as the file tree on the disk.
>
>          Luuk
>
>
>
>
>          -----Original Message-----
>          From: qt-creator-bounces at trolltech.com<mailto:qt-creator-bounces at trolltech.com>
>          [mailto:qt-creator-bounces at trolltech.com] On Behalf Of Adam
>          Higerd
>          Sent: 19 March 2009 23:19
>          To: qt-creator at trolltech.com<mailto:qt-creator at trolltech.com>
>          Subject: Re: [Qt-creator] Project Tree
>
>          Porfirio wrote:
>          >  Hi!
>          >
>          >  I really like QtCreator, its a great software but sometimes
>          its hard
>          >  to organize a big project because all files becomes messed
>          even if
>          >  they are in diferent folders.
>          >
>          >  In Eclipse it shows the folder strocture as it is in system,
>          thats a
>          >  good solution, in Netbeans you can have virtual folders and
>          add your
>          >  files there, even if they are all in same folder or
>          whatever.
>          >
>          >  Something like this is realy required!
>
>          Creator does this based on project organization; if you have a
>          subdirs
>          project, it shows each subproject as a separate folder in the
>          tree.
>
>          Meanwhile, if you have a project that's large enough to be
>          spanning into
>          subdirectories, you're looking at a case where you might want
>          subprojects ANYWAY for the sake of build performance.
>
>          /s/ Adam
>          _______________________________________________
>          Qt-creator mailing list
>          Qt-creator at trolltech.com<mailto:Qt-creator at trolltech.com>
>          http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
>
>          _______________________________________________
>          Qt-creator mailing list
>          Qt-creator at trolltech.com<mailto:Qt-creator at trolltech.com>
>          http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-creator mailing list
> Qt-creator at trolltech.com<mailto:Qt-creator at trolltech.com>
> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-creator mailing list
> Qt-creator at trolltech.com<mailto:Qt-creator at trolltech.com>
> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-creator mailing list
> Qt-creator at trolltech.com
> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
>
>
>
>    




More information about the Qt-creator-old mailing list