[Qt-creator] 1.30beta - Cmake + Visual Studio 6
Danny Price
deepblue842 at googlemail.com
Wed Oct 28 21:40:51 CET 2009
Off-topic but what I find even more troubling is that so many
companies STILL use Visual Source Safe 6 (and pay for it no less!)
simply because it's what they're used to.
That atrocious product should be banned!
On 28 Oct 2009, at 20:25, Coda Highland wrote:
> VC++6 has a bunch of quite atrocious limitations; it was released
> before the C++98 spec was finalized and thus gets a bunch of stuff
> wrong. (Example: VC++6 has no support for templated member functions.)
> Qt had to hack around those limitations for a long time and official
> support was finally dropped a while back. You should still be able to
> coerce it into working if you put some effort into it but you won't
> get any official support for it. (That said, you MIGHT be able to get
> community support for it from #qt or the qt-interest ML.)
>
> /s/ Adam
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Hari Sundar <hsundar at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Why is Visual Studio 6 support missing ? Cmake does support Visual
>> Studio 6,
>> so why is it missing from Qt Creator ?
>>
>> I know it is an antiquated compiler, but I have some legacy
>> projects that
>> need to use VC6 and would prefer a better IDE (with FakeVIM) ...
>>
>> thanks,
>> Hari
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qt-creator mailing list
>> Qt-creator at trolltech.com
>> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-creator mailing list
> Qt-creator at trolltech.com
> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
More information about the Qt-creator-old
mailing list