[Qt-creator] new C++ indenter: request for feedback

[Coda Highland]

You can build QtWebKit that fast? *blink* I'd believe the 20 minute
figure if you disable QtWebKit but I think Creator needs it.

/s/ Adam

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc at arcor.de> wrote:
> Hours?  It only needs about 30 minutes to build on an (by now) old Core
> 2 Duo.  I even got it to 20 minutes if I disable stuff I don't need.
>
> It's really fast and easy to build your own binaries.  I highly
> recommend it :)
>
>
> On 07/08/2010 09:30 PM, Coda Highland wrote:
>> Seriously, if you've got reasonably modern hardware the whole rebuild
>> process should only take a couple hours (unless you're building
>> four-way universal binaries or something, but that's just silly if
>> you're not intending to distribute).
>>
>> /s/ Adam
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:14 PM,<kai.koehne at nokia.com>  wrote:
>>> Bryce Schober wrote on Thursday, July 08, 2010 6:51 PM:
>>>>
>>>> Too bad we don't get master binary snapshots. Maybe I should repeat this mantra indefinitely. ;-)
>>>
>>> I think we got the point now :) We have some dedicated machines here for the nightly builds. They are however building from the 2.0 branch, because that's were the next release will come from (see e-mail from Eike a while ago). And we AFAIK don't have the resources to build two in configurations in parallel.
>>>
>>> Anyhow, out of curiosity: Why do you push so much for nightly builds, in contrast to compiling yourself? It's true that you might have to compile Qt yourself then once, but then updating / recompiling creator afterwards isn't really a big hassle.
>>>
>>> Kai
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Qt-creator mailing list
>>> Qt-creator at trolltech.com
>>> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-creator mailing list
> Qt-creator at trolltech.com
> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
>