[Qt-creator] Whacky thought of the day

Vojtěch Král vojtech at kral.hk
Tue Mar 4 02:37:42 CET 2014



I don't really see why you would want to do something like that. Headers
are a feature, not a bug. I don't think many people would regard that as
an "elevation". 

Regards, VK 

On 2014-03-04 01:17, Jason H wrote: 

> So Qt comes along and helps kick C++ into the modern era. I was wondering if we could use Qt Creator to address one of my remaining complaints of C++. 
> I really like languages like Python, C#, and Java where there is only an implementation file. While we can't get rid of headers, it would be cool if we could define a class file that gets split by QtCreator or qmake that would prepare the .h and .cpp files from a unified file. 
> Creator helps with the maintaining the header and the C with the light bulb, but this isn't as elegant as having one file that controls both. I'm wondering if its possible and f clang would be any help in reaching this new level of elevating C++? 
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-creator mailing list
> Qt-creator at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator [1]

[1] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-creator/attachments/20140304/3688827b/attachment.html>

More information about the Qt-creator mailing list