[Qt-creator] What are your favorite clang-tidy checks

[Vadim Peretokin]

Excellent.

As for the default, I'm not that experienced with all the flags, but the
ones you pick will influence a sizeable portion of Qt code in the future :)

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 6:55 PM Ivan Donchevskii <ivan.donchevskii at qt.io>
wrote:

> Yes, there are checkboxes for fix-its so you can apply selected ones.
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Vadim Peretokin <vperetokin at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 14, 2018 6:42 PM
> *To:* Ivan Donchevskii
> *Cc:* Michael Jackson; qt-creator at qt-project.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Qt-creator] What are your favorite clang-tidy checks
> That's a great addition! Can it also run fixits?
>
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, 6:10 pm Ivan Donchevskii, <ivan.donchevskii at qt.io>
> wrote:
>
> In Qt Creator 4.7 there's a separate tool (Analyze menu) that runs
> Clang-Tidy checks over the selected files which does not affect your opened
> documents. I hope it solves your problem at least partially :)
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Qt-creator <qt-creator-bounces+ivan.donchevskii=
> qt.io at qt-project.org> on behalf of Michael Jackson <
> mike.jackson at bluequartz.net>
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 14, 2018 6:03:37 PM
> *To:* qt-creator at qt-project.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Qt-creator] What are your favorite clang-tidy checks
>
>
> I tend to go back and forth between turning it off so that code completion
> actually completes in a reasonable amount of time (~1 second) or having all
> the helpful insights into my code base. It is almost like QtCreator needs
> to have 2 threads running. One for the code completion and one for the
> clang-tidy stuff.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Mike Jackson
>
>
>
> On 6/13/18, 3:44 AM, "Qt-creator on behalf of Ivan Donchevskii" <
> qt-creator-bounces+mike.jackson=bluequartz.net at qt-project.org on behalf
> of ivan.donchevskii at qt.io> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi!
>
>
>
> On the contributors summit I mentioned that we want to introduce the
> "default" set of flags for Clang-Tidy which can be used as a starting point
> for analysis and is good enough for some random project developed in Qt
> Creator.
>
> We have an example of it in https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/230400/ but
> not sure if it is actually the proper list.
>
>
>
> Here's the list itself
> - "bugprone-*,cppcoreguidelines-*,misc-*,modernize-*,performance-*,readability-*,-cppcoreguidelines-owning-memory,-readability-braces-around-statements,-readability-implicit-bool-conversion,-readability-named-parameter"
>
>
>
> Let us know if there's something you would like to add or remove from it.
> You can check the whole tree of currently available checks in 4.7 beta or
> in one of our latest Qt Creator snapshots.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Ivan
>
> _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list
> Qt-creator at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-creator mailing list
> Qt-creator at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-creator/attachments/20180614/fa6a51a5/attachment.html>