[Qt-creator] 100% CPU core on a README.md

[Christian Gagneraud]

On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 17:42, Eike Ziller <Eike.Ziller at qt.io> wrote:
>
> Which version of Qt Creator are you using?
> E.g. Qt Creator 4.11.0 and .1 had https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTCREATORBUG-23647 , fixed in 4.11.2

4.11.2.
Could be due to my clang-tidy settings, defaults are 'thorough checks'
and 'build b/f analysis' is on.
Maybe i should have a project override.
Need to do more testing.

Chris



>
> Br, Eike
>
> > On Apr 4, 2020, at 13:32, Christian Gagneraud <chgans at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 00:05, Christian Gagneraud <chgans at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Any known issue with MD? Or maybe with the language server (I use that
> >> for python)?
> >
> > Oops, sorry, the issue is not caused by that file. I had another QtC
> > open w/ a 'broken' project.
> >
> > I need to understand a project that contains a USB firmware and
> > Windows dlls and exes sources, and the whole thing is for Visual
> > studio.
> > So I created a top level qmake file, with ONLY
> > INCLUDEPATH
> > QMAKE_CFLAGS
> > SOURCES
> >
> > None of this can build, b/c it requires windows and a custom ARM
> > toolchain (I have none). But at least i can use QtC, and some of the
> > benefit of the code model, which is what I only need.
> >
> > So, is it expected/acceptable, that QtC needs 100% of a core to cope
> > with unbuildable source code?
> >
> > I think that being able to use QtC for retro-engineering from source
> > is a nice capability.
> >
> > Chris
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qt-creator mailing list
> > Qt-creator at qt-project.org
> > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/qt-creator
>
> --
> Eike Ziller
> Principal Software Engineer
>
> The Qt Company GmbH
> Erich-Thilo-Straße 10
> D-12489 Berlin
> eike.ziller at qt.io
> http://qt.io
> Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi,
> Juha Varelius, Mika Harjuaho
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 144331 B
>