[Qt-interest] QT Jambi, we don't have to use C++ anymore ?

[Pau Garcia i Quiles]

2009/4/21 Kosta Hristov <userqt at gmail.com>:
> Hi guys,
> I am (comparatively) new to QT. Yesterday I have read about Jambi, the new
> QT API for Java.  I know Java and I am using C++ from a while. So... it
> seems now we don't need to know C++ for QT, right ? I think in the future QT
> users will be Java users, because very few people use C++ these days and
> Java is more easy to learn and use.
> What do you think about that ?

QtJambi is dead, unless someone picks it:
http://www.qtsoftware.com/about/news/preview-of-final-qt-jambi-release-available

On the other hand, there are bindings for Qt, coming mostly from KDE,
for Ruby, C#, Python, Perl, Lua, Lisp, Falcon and maybe others:
http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Languages

-- 
Pau Garcia i Quiles
http://www.elpauer.org
(Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)