[Qt-interest] QT Jambi, we don't have to use C++ anymore ?

[piotr maliński]

There is many bindings to Qt (C#, Python, Java, Ruby) which can be used to
develop applications, but the base is Qt in C++ :)

2009/4/21 Martin Hofius <Martin at hofius-online.com>

> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, 21. April 2009 schrieb Kosta Hristov:
> > Hi guys,
> > I am (comparatively) new to QT. Yesterday I have read about Jambi, the
> new
> > QT API for Java.  I know Java and I am using C++ from a while. So... it
> > seems now we don't need to know C++ for QT, right ? I think in the future
> > QT users will be Java users, because very few people use C++ these days
> and
> > Java is more easy to learn and use. What do you think about that ?
>
> beside the fact that jambi will not be supported by QTSoftware in the near
> future: C++ has definitly some advantages compared to java... speed, size,
> possible generation of statically linked programs (without dependancies to
> virtual machines or non system libs)...
>
>  C++ will certainly live for many many years ;-)
>
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-interest mailing list
> Qt-interest at trolltech.com
> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-interest
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-interest-old/attachments/20090421/4546fc82/attachment.html