[Qt-interest] LGPL and static linking

[Konrad Rosenbaum]

On Tuesday 01 December 2009 13:57:32 Robin Helgelin wrote:
> What about Webkit? I was told that as Webkit is LGPL, I'm not able to
> static link to Webkit even though I have a commercial license of Qt.
> If this also happens with QtScript, it means that all licenses becomes
> unusable for us if we still want to use the whole Qt stack.


out of curiosity: why do people prefer static linking? Why do you consider 
dynamic linking bad?

Maybe this discussion helps to enlighten all of us... ;-)


	Konrad
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-interest-old/attachments/20091201/4f9d19a9/attachment.bin