[Qt-interest] Need some practical advicehere... model/view framework
Kaleb Pederson
kaleb.pederson at gmail.com
Fri Jul 3 00:22:26 CEST 2009
On Thursday 02 July 2009 03:08:07 pm Sean Harmer wrote:
> Patric wrote:
> > Thank you guys,
> > and why to use the QStandartItemModel instead of QStringListModel ? Because
> > I want to fill the rows with strings, a far as I know QStandatItemModel is
> > for more complex objects ?
> >
> You said yourself that your data is tabular in format, hence derive from
> QAbstractTableModel seems logical to me. The underlying data structure
> that you choose is up to you. I find it helpful to think of the model
> classes as merely providing an interface that the views use to
> communicate with your app about your data (and potentially modify it).
I'm pretty much of the same opinion. I've found that it works very well to create a domain model of the system without any regard for what the QAbstractItemModel needs. Once I have a valid and well-functioning domain model, it doesn't take very long to create an adapter between that and the QAbstractItemModel (or appropriate subclass).
This allows you to ignore all the model-view specifics when working on the (domain) model and lends itself to a richer vocabulary.
--Kaleb
> The implementation can be hidden behind the model class interface in any
> way you see fit and of course you are free to update your data
> structures in other ways as long as you remember to inform the model
> about the changes so that it can in turn let any other proxy models and
> views know about the changes.
More information about the Qt-interest-old
mailing list