[Qt-interest] Which compiler would you recommend for Windows?

Sven Grunewaldt strayer at olle-orks.org
Fri Mar 6 11:32:11 CET 2009


Am 06.03.2009 03:37, schrieb Martin Schröer:
> Andreas Pakulat schrieb:
>    
>> On 05.03.09 12:54:42, Sven Grunewaldt wrote:
>>
>>      
>>> Hi List,
>>>
>>> I currently don't know which compiler I should use under windows... I
>>> have access to Visual Studio 2008 Professional via MSDNAA and there are
>>> MinGW and TDragons MinGW+GCC4.3 builds.
>>>
>>>        
>> Use Visual Studio, its generally faster when compiling, it has often
>> better error messages, is sometimes stricter (sometimes just weird
>> though) and in general more stable (regarding ICE). I didn't do much
>> with mingw/gcc4.3 yet, but mingw/gcc3.4 isn't fun to work with (is not
>> even able to compile the code I work on in my spare time).
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>>
>>      
> Plus - you can't compile Phonon while using MinGW (yet) ...
> Using the VisualC++ (even Express Edition) nmake, you can.
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-interest mailing list
> Qt-interest at trolltech.com
> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-interest
>    
Thanks for the replies so far!

Seems VS is generally more used. I will look into this Visual Assist X 
thingy, or are there any other things I could do to "improve" 
IntelliSense? (Besides waiting for VS2010...)

Regards,
Sven Grunewaldt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-interest-old/attachments/20090306/699d27f9/attachment.html 


More information about the Qt-interest-old mailing list