[Qt-interest] why signals are not objects?
Luca Ferrari
fluca1978 at infinito.it
Mon May 4 11:11:30 CEST 2009
Ok, maybe a trivial question, but I didn't find anything about in the
archives: why signals are not implemented as c++ objects? Should not be
simpler the implementation of the signal/slot mechanism? I agree that the moc
provides more expressiveness but objects have a simpler implementation.
So, what is the reason for choosing the moc instead of a set of classes?
Luca
More information about the Qt-interest-old
mailing list