[Qt-interest] [OT] Replying to Messages
Andrew Maclean
andrew.amaclean at gmail.com
Thu May 7 01:29:55 CEST 2009
NNTP is often blocked by many companies now.
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Marco Borm <qt-lists at retrodesignfan.eu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> some weeks ago I was minutes away asking the same BUT then I researched
> a little bit and have to say that I changed my opinion.
> http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful/
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>
> But what I have to ask:
> Why the hack is nobody using the good old, but much better than
> mailinglists, NNTP anymore?
>
>
> Greetings,
> Marco
>
> Raja Sekharan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've noticed that many in this list simply hit the reply button when
>> responding to an email. These emails go straight to the person who asked
>> the question or the last responder. As a result we do not see the
>> solutions or some discussions on this mailing list.
>>
>> Can the mailing list software be configured to add a Reply-to header
>> to all emails? Otherwise everyone has to change the to address manually
>> every time they send a response.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Raj
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qt-interest mailing list
>> Qt-interest at trolltech.com
>> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-interest
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-interest mailing list
> Qt-interest at trolltech.com
> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-interest
>
--
___________________________________________
Andrew J. P. Maclean
Centre for Autonomous Systems
The Rose Street Building J04
The University of Sydney 2006 NSW
AUSTRALIA
Ph: +61 2 9351 3283
Fax: +61 2 9351 7474
URL: http://www.acfr.usyd.edu.au/
___________________________________________
More information about the Qt-interest-old
mailing list