[Qt-interest] (no subject)

[Thiago Macieira]

Em Quinta-feira 14 Maio 2009, às 14:25:41, hb7d9 at fastmail.fm escreveu:
> - Can the ActiveQt module be used with the LPGL version of Qt?
> http://doc.trolltech.com/4.5/activeqt.html says it's not possible, while
> http://lists.trolltech.com/pipermail/qt-interest/2009-March/003314.html
> seems to indicate the opposite.

This has been corrected already. See:

http://doc.trolltech.com/4.5-snapshot/activeqt.html

> - How do the commercial and the open source licenses differ? On
> http://doc.trolltech.com/4.5/commercialeditions.html there is a list
> that compares the two commercial licenses, however I could not find a
> similar list that compares commercial and non-commercial licenses.

The Open Source version matches the Full Framework commercial version.

> - Some of the 3rd party modules like phonon are released under the LGPL.
> If the commercial license is used, is it possible to keep modifications
> of those 3rd party modules closed-source or does the LGPL still apply
> and the modifications have to be published?

The Phonon and WebKit modules are only licensed LGPL. This applies to both the 
commercial and open source versions. That means you must comply with the terms 
of the LGPL even if you're a commercial customer, if you choose to use them.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) nokia.com
  Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Software
     Sandakerveien 116, NO-0402 Oslo, Norway
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-interest-old/attachments/20090514/f57c7d3d/attachment.bin