[Qt-interest] Qt Containers (or: why I must use STL)
Michael Bieber
qtlist at traits.de
Tue Oct 13 13:09:54 CEST 2009
> Your view. I happen to seriously dislike the STL in every way. boost is just a
> bloatier version.
> Still doesn't have decent string class afaik.
Technically, std::string is not part of the STL. From a user point of
view, QString is the one thing I've always preferred to std::string.
Regarding containers - we had hot discussions here at the time of
introducing Qt4. Personally speaking, bloating a library is a bigger
issue in comparison and in the long run. Simply the fat-growing thing is
evil.
Not to speak about problems in projects, where for the one reason or the
other both container variants exist, etc..
It always means handling unnecessary complexity. A good interface/API
should be complete *and minimal*. The last part forgotten far too often
nowadays.
Micha
More information about the Qt-interest-old
mailing list