[Qt-interest] It would be nice if the QT user interface styling and widgets was as detailed and polished as this.

Andrew Stuart andrew.stuart at flatraterecruitment.com.au
Sun Sep 27 11:23:23 CEST 2009


Sorry - Qt.  I'll spell it right in future.

Yes we tried graphicsview but we had to revert when we found that  
Flash doesn't consistently work with it and we also found many  
differences between the way widgets behave when in graphicsview versus  
normal mode.  For apps that don't require webkit/flash graphicsview  
looks interesting.

as




On 27/09/2009, at 7:08 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:

Em Domingo 27. Setembro 2009, às 10.43.45, Andrew Stuart escreveu:
> From the outside it 'QT seems intent on building new features and
> subsystems rather than making what it does have world class.  It would
> be nice to feel that QT stops developing new functionality for a
> couple of years and goes back and makes it's existing functionality
> dramatically better.  The alternative is to have a very broad platform
> with lots of features that are only implemented well, rather than
> excellently.
>

First of all, it's Qt, with a lowercase t. It's a trademark, so please  
spell
it right.

Second, that will never happen. We'll never stop developing features.  
Much
less for a "couple of years". Please look at what Qt was 4 years ago,  
or even
4.0, and tell me if you were comfortable with the features that were  
there.
Does any other toolkit stop developing features?

Besides, you are asking for more features. You are asking for the  
ability to
style even more, to control even more the appearance of the  
application. And
you're not simply asking for the ability to do that -- which you  
already have
-- you're asking that we add features to the widgets that we do ship  
with to 
support the styling you want. I call that new features.

We have to constantly strike the balance between new features and  
maintenance.
We've spent the past 3 releases doing a lot of optimisations and  
performance
improvements. We're overhauling some of the internal basics in order  
to do it
even better.

Finally, have you taken a look at Declarative UI and QML?

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
  Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
      PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
      E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358

Qt Developer Days 2009 | Registration Now Open!
Munich, Germany: Oct 12 - 14     San Francisco, California: Nov 2 - 4
      http://qt.nokia.com/qtdevdays2009
_______________________________________________
Qt-interest mailing list
Qt-interest at trolltech.com
http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-interest
-- 

Click here to report this message as spam:
https://login.mailguard.com.au/report/1ymluiZaYe/77M6ARocUH42uR0DVyqHtF/0




More information about the Qt-interest-old mailing list