[Qt-interest] A small request !

[Mihail Naydenov]

----- Original Message ----
> From: Ian Thomson <Ian.Thomson at iongeo.com>
> To: qt-interest at trolltech.com
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 4:12:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [Qt-interest] A small request !
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > 
> > No, no profiling, just the "the right thing" feel.
> > 
> > You should agree: 
> > 
> > setX(x() + something); 
> > 
> > instead of:
> > 
> > xp += something;
> > 
> > is both uglier, and (almost certainly) slower.
> > 
> 
> Both setX(int) and x() are declared inlinable and will certainly be 
> inlined by the compiler. That means there is no speed difference at all. 
> You can alternatively use the reference call:
> 
> rx() += something;

Now, this was helpful! I remember noticing these in the header, but for some reason forgot  them in the actual code.
Thank You for pointing that out!

I guess the arguments now are just academic.
MihailNaydenov

> 
> This will also incur no function call penalty and almost matches the 
> syntax you desire. I don't really see either of them as being ugly, in 
> fact both methods are very clear.
> 
> Cheers,
> Ian.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-interest mailing list
> Qt-interest at trolltech.com
> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-interest