[Qt-interest] The C++ language committee

Gordon Schumacher whiplash at pobox.com
Fri Apr 16 21:50:59 CEST 2010


On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:03:44 -0400, Gregory Seidman
<gsslist+qt at anthropohedron.net> wrote:
> That's a reason for using C. C++ provides no advantage over C for
> computationally intensive software.
>   

Or, depending on what you're doing, Haskell, Matlab, OCaml or even
Fortran (which is far from a dead language)... indeed.  There's a reason
that not only does one's toolbox contain more than just a screwdriver,
it generally contains more than one screwdriver.



More information about the Qt-interest-old mailing list