[Qt-interest] The C++ language committee
Gordon Schumacher
whiplash at pobox.com
Fri Apr 16 21:50:59 CEST 2010
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:03:44 -0400, Gregory Seidman
<gsslist+qt at anthropohedron.net> wrote:
> That's a reason for using C. C++ provides no advantage over C for
> computationally intensive software.
>
Or, depending on what you're doing, Haskell, Matlab, OCaml or even
Fortran (which is far from a dead language)... indeed. There's a reason
that not only does one's toolbox contain more than just a screwdriver,
it generally contains more than one screwdriver.
More information about the Qt-interest-old
mailing list