[Qt-interest] SOLUTION TO: (was OS X, Qt & 'was not compiled with -fobjc-gc or -fobjc-gc-only, but the application requires GC' error?)

kent williams nkwmailinglists at gmail.com
Tue Apr 27 17:03:21 CEST 2010


I don't think you understand how mailing lists work.  Once sent,
messages can't be removed, much to the chagrin of many people who
regret things they've posted.

And in this particular case, this thread will come up if you search on
that error message, in addition to the original thread.  Only this
thread starts the subject line SOLUTION TO, which, if you can't find
it when looking through search results, you're not paying attention.


On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:47 PM, JJDaNiMoTh <jjdanimoth at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 26 Apr 2010, at 18:57, kent williams wrote:
>
>> The problem was found and solved here:
>>
>> http://www.vtk.org/pipermail/vtk-developers/2010-February/007413.html
>>
>> The problem comes from VTK's Cocoa support, and is solved by adding:
>>
>> -DVTK_REQUIRED_OBJCXX_FLAGS:STRING=""
>>
>> to the CMake command line (or explicitly setting that flag if you run
>> CMake interactively).
>
> OT:
>
> Hello, I want to ask if there is some rule of the mailing list which,
> for each problem solved, the starter needs to "break" the thread
> itself with a new subject.
>
> If it exists, I would ask if can be removed, because the method has
> two problems:
>
> 1 - When a user do a search (google p.e.) he will miss the solution
> (original thread is probably in higher results, since it is often
> clicked, instead of the solution which could be in last positions)
> 2 - Ugly result when looking in the archives (see [1])
>
> Obvious, the first point is the most important.
>
> Many thanks
>
> [1] http://lists.trolltech.com/pipermail/qt-interest/2010-April/thread.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-interest mailing list
> Qt-interest at trolltech.com
> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-interest
>



More information about the Qt-interest-old mailing list