[Qt-interest] Are there any disadvantages with QT
Marat Abrarov
abrarov at mail.ru
Sat Feb 27 11:57:58 CET 2010
Qt is the best for "native" (!) development - don't compare it with .Net at all! Compare Qt with GTK, MFC, wxWidgets.
"Native" and managed code exist together at the different areas which sometimes (sometimes it's developers' choice only)
intersect. MS Office 2007 wasn't written in .Net (neither in .Net nor in MFC) - why? MS Visual Studio 2010 (UI written
in .Net) haven't been released yet - why? (this is one of the reasons of cause). Qt is rather good not only because of
its crossplatform capabilities but because of its accurate implementation and its attention to details of UI (I use only
Qt for Windows).
The only "disadvantages with QT" I can speak now is the insufficient amount of 3-d party rich widgets - may be the
reason of this lies near MS support for the .Net advancement.
Best regards,
Marat.
More information about the Qt-interest-old
mailing list