[Qt-interest] Licensing

[Srdjan Todorovic]

On 2 June 2010 08:32, Jan <janusius at gmx.net> wrote:
>
> Thanks for your thoughts on this ... but if that is the case (selling
> LGPL'd Qt software) I don't understand why the term "commercial" is
> exclusively appearing in the commercial licence description.
>
> Probably "commercial" is something different here.

I thought that in this context, "commercial" means that you can keep
your code closed-source.

Additionally, I've been told by someone on IRC a few months ago that
developers must download the commercial Qt sources if they want to do
commercial development, even though they already have a valid and paid
commercial license with Trolltech. Surely it shouldn't matter which
source archive you download as long as you've paid for a currently
valid license?

Regards,
Srdjan