[Qt-interest] C++ or QML
Jason H
scorp1us at yahoo.com
Thu Jun 24 16:45:53 CEST 2010
QML will be slower to start, but easier to develop and maintain. You will probably end up using JS, which though faser these days, is still slower than native.
C++ will get you all the low-level control you could want, i.e. if you need to do tweaking. And coding isn't nearly as easy.
I would, since you're embedded, prototype in QML and then implement in C++.
________________________________
From: OS Prog <osprog at gmail.com>
To: qt-interest at trolltech.com
Sent: Thu, June 24, 2010 6:19:23 AM
Subject: [Qt-interest] C++ or QML
Hi,
I'm starting a new Qt project which is intended to run on PC and embedded. The animations are essential.
What can you suggest me to use for the animations - QML or C++? What are the benefits and disadvantages of both?
Regards,
Nik
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-interest-old/attachments/20100624/b599cf8a/attachment.html
More information about the Qt-interest-old
mailing list