[Qt-interest] QT and KDE code

Andreas Pakulat apaku at gmx.de
Mon Mar 22 21:06:59 CET 2010


On 22.03.10 19:58:55, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
> I was reading some mailing lists and articles about coding for KDE vs
> coding for QT. In that swarm of information the main idea i got was that
> KDE classes are basically QT classes with added functionality and names
> starting with K instead of Q. Does that mean that basically if i replace
> all Q's in class names in header files with K (when the corresponding
> class is available) the code will compile without any further
> modifications (provided i have included all the needed KDE headers of
> course)?

Usually yes. But that doesn't necessarily mean you're taking advantage
of the added functionality that KDE classes provide.

Andreas

-- 
Don't feed the bats tonight.



More information about the Qt-interest-old mailing list