[Qt-interest] Qt and KDE code
Brad Hards
bradh at frogmouth.net
Tue Mar 23 07:56:34 CET 2010
On Tuesday 23 March 2010 04:50:48 pm M. Bashir Al-Noimi wrote:
> Why KDE isn't completely cross platform just like Qt? although it
> inherited from many Qt classes (KDE applications in Windows are absolute
> disaster where Qt works smoothly in many platforms) !!!
"absolute disaster" is quite inflamatory language - it looks like you're just
trolling.
There are a few things where the KDE Software Collection uses libraries or
features that don't work (or aren't often tested) on Windows, so there are
some differences.
> Why portability of GTK -generally- is better than KDE specially by
> comparing to KDE3?
Do you remember that KDE 3 used Qt 3? Do you remember that Qt 3 wasn't GPL on
Windows? So not many Free Software developers used it, and therefore there was
no porting effort. [Also, a few things have changed since 2005, which was the
last feature release in the KDE 3 series].
Also comparison between GTK and KDE isn't an "apples to applies" comparison.
GTK is a toolkit, so it is more appropriate to compare it to Qt (perhaps
QtGui). If you want to compare applications, you should compare KDE with
Gnome.
> Sorry for obtrusion but I was looking for answers years ago but I
> couldn't get them.
You might like to ask more politely, and to provide specific questions rather
than something that looks quite like a "rant".
Brad
More information about the Qt-interest-old
mailing list